History-Snapshot

Friday, January 6, 2023

Building Tax and SEZ

 Kerala Building Tax Act exempt worship places, charitable places govt bodies (3(1)(b))from payment of building tax.

However, it does not bring clarity to applicability of the same in SEZ Codevelopers and Units.

If it is a Factory Building Tax is exempted in Kerala. (Technopolis vs Tahsildar)

However, IT policy around India exempts IT Buildings from payment of Building Tax, however Kerala has not made their stand clear on Building Tax.

Tuesday, February 24, 2015

Related party - 188 attraction in case of PDI

Perpetual debt instrument cannot be defined as property for the purpose of Companies Act, 2013. It is just a bundle of rights and is not defined as property anywhere.


X company owning PDI in Y (a related company), can transfer the same to its director(who is a related party) or a related body corporate without attracting 188 (1) (b) or 179 read with rules to file MGT 14.

Hence, it can be said that any 'investment' transfer which does not fall under sell/buy of a property will be outside the purview of 188/179 rules thereto.

Tuesday, January 20, 2015

Rights issue under companies act 2013

Board resolution will suffice unless otherwise so suggest contrary.

Board meeting for issuing offer letter

Issue of offer letter as per 62 I a I, closing the offer  maximum by 15days

Getting acceptance or denial letter

Allot in a board meeting and file pas 3 as per section 39(4).

Rights issue is not covered under preferential issue and is very simple to do. Offer letter also as of now no specific format. 

Saturday, August 23, 2014

Maximum number of partners in partnership firm in India

Maximum number of partners in partnership firm in India

·         Partnership act does not limit the number of Partners
·         Companies Act 1956 Section 11 prescribed maximum as 20 (indirectly)
·         Companies Act 2013 Section 464 stated that maximum can be 100 –Rulesmade thereto - Rule 10 of Chapter 29 – limits the same to Fifty (50)
·         Thus maximum number in a partnership firm can be fifty (50) only.

Monday, June 30, 2014

Inter Corporate Deposit

Whether Inter Corporate Deposit (ICD) is Deposit under Companies Act?

Section 2 (31) “deposit” includes any receipt of money by way of deposit or loan or in any other form by a company, but does not include such categories of amount as may be prescribed in consultation with the Reserve Bank of India;

Companies (Acceptance of Deposit) Rules 2014, Rule 2 (1) c (vi) specifically excludes any amount received by a company from any other company.
Section 74. (1) of Companies Act, 2013 Where in respect of any deposit accepted by a company before the commencement of this Act, the amount of such deposit or part thereof or any interest due thereon remains unpaid on such commencement or becomes due at any time thereafter, the company shall—

(a) file, within a period of three months from such commencement or from the date on which such payments, are due, with the Registrar a statement of all the deposits accepted by the company and sums remaining unpaid on such amount with the interest payable thereon along with the arrangements made for such repayment, notwithstanding
anything contained in any other law for the time being in force or under the terms and conditions subject to which the deposit was accepted or any scheme framed under any law; and

(b) repay within one year from such commencement or from the date on which such payments are due, whichever is earlier.

Answer: No. It is not deposit as per Companies Act, 2013/ 1956. It is loan. The name doesn’t make it deposit.

Governing Section: 185 – Private Companies will be hit if  not specifically exempted.

Tuesday, June 3, 2014

[Interpretation of third proviso of 188-Companies Act, 2013]

“Provided also that nothing in this sub-section shall apply to any transactions entered into by the company in its ordinary course of business other than transactions which are not on an arm’s length basis.”

Situation

X & Y are related. X is doing curd selling business in the market at Rs. 20/- per packet.

Situation 1

X selling curd to Y at Rs. 20/- exempted from 188(1)
*ordinary course and arms length

Situation 2

X selling curd to Y at Rs. 10/-  (Special Resolution required –if capital more than 10 Crore or if satisfies any of the condition in Chapter XII Rules, Rule 15


*ordinary course but not on arms length (favouring shareholder)

Situation 3

X leasing Property (which is not in ordinary course) to Y at Rs. 10/- (Special Resolution required –if capital more than 10 Crore or if satisfies any of the condition in Chapter XII Rules, Rule 15

*not in ordinary course and not in arms length basis


Situation 4

X leasing Property (which is not in ordinary course) to Y at Rs. 20/- (Special Resolution required –if capital more than 10 Crore or if satisfies any of the condition in Chapter XII Rules, Rule 15


*not in ordinary course

Sunday, June 1, 2014

For Statutory Register under Companies Act, 2013 - contact 8281514246

For Statutory Register under Companies Act, 2013 - contact 8281514246 or place your orders at statregisterca2013@gmail.com

Friday, April 25, 2014

Related Party transactions (Companies Act, 2013)

Approval required for Related Party transactions (Companies Act, 2013) is mentioned in Section 188 & Chapter 12 Rules

Section – 188 – provides such Transactions as below:-

(a) sale, purchase or supply of any goods or materials;
(b) selling or otherwise disposing of, or buying, property of any kind;
(c) leasing of property of any kind;
(d) availing or rendering of any services;
(e) appointment of any agent for purchase or sale of goods, materials, services or property;
(f) such related party's appointment to any office or place of profit in the company, its subsidiary company or associate company; and
(g) underwriting the subscription of any securities or derivatives thereof, of the company:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Clarification:-

1.      A Company with paid up capital above 10 Crores: For all above 188 transactions, special resolution is required.

2.      A Company with less than 10 Crores paid up capital will require special resolution in following cases:-

(i)                 sale, purchase or supply of any goods or materials directly or through appointment of agents exceeding twenty five percent of the annual turnover as mentioned in clause (a) and clause (e) respectively of sub-section (1) of section 188;

(ii)               selling or otherwise disposing of, or buying, property of any kind directly or through appointment of agents exceeding ten percent. of net worth as mentioned in clause (b) and clause (e) respectively of sub-section (1) of section 188;


(iii)             leasing of property of any kind exceeding ten percent of the net worth or exceeding ten percent. of turnover as mentioned in clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 188;

(iv)       availing or rendering of any services directly or through appointment of agents exceeding ten percent. of the net worth as mentioned in clause (d) and clause (e) of sub-section (1) of section 188;

3.      All other Cases:


Board Resolution is only required.

Companies Act, 2013 - w.e.f.April 1, 2014

The new Act comes with stringent provisions for compliance. Almost all related party transaction require special resolution. Number of directorship limited to 20. Private companies compliance has increased manifold.Ambit of related party transactions widened.

Thursday, July 25, 2013

Secured Corporate Debentures Vs. Public Deposit Norms

Secured Corporate Debentures Vs. Public Deposit 


The Ministry of Corporate Affairs, vide a notification dated 21st March 2013  (“Notification”), has 

made a change in Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules 1975 (“Deposit Rules”). 




Why are debentures “public deposits”?

It may sound doubtful as to how debentures are treated as public deposits at all. However, the definition of the


 term “deposit” in corporate laws in India is much wider than what is commonly thought. Any amount received, 

refundable with or without interest, is a deposit. There are certain exceptions laid down in Rule 2 (b) of the 

Deposit Rules. Hence, even if an amount is raised by issue of debentures, it is still a deposit, unless it falls in 

one of the exceptions listed in Rule 2 (b).


Prior to the Notification, Rule 2(b)(x) of the Deposits Rules exempted debentures if:


“any amount raised by the issue of bonds or debentures secured by the mortgage of any immovable 

property of the company or with an option to convert them into shares in the company provided that in 

the case of such bonds or debentures secured by the mortgage of any immovable property the amount o


f such bonds or debentures shall not exceed the market value of such immovable property.”


As is evident, there were two exceptions – debentures secured by mortgage of immovable property, and 

convertible debentures.

However, with this Notification, Ministry has reworded and replaced the said Rule with the following:


“any amount raised by the issue of bonds or debentures secured by the mortgage of any fixed assets 

referred to in Schedule VI of the Act excluding intangible assets of the company or with an option to 

convert them into shares in the company:

Provided that in the case of such bonds or debentures secured by the mortgage of any fixed assets 

referred to in Schedule VI or of the Act excluding intangible assets the amount of such bonds or 

debentures shall not exceed the market value of such fixed assets.”
           
As an effect of the Notification, now, the issue of debentures or bonds will be exempt from the Deposit 


Rules if: a) the issue is secured by mortgage of any fixed asset of the company as referred in Schedule VI 

having market value more or equal to the value of the issue; or b) the issue is of the convertible 

debentures.

Since the law has been changed from “mortgage of immovable property” to “mortgage of fixed assets”, it appears that the charge may be created on any of the fixed assets of the company. However, use of word mortgage has limited the flexibility.